r - setRefClass pass by value, pass by reference -
I suspect that I do not understand all the aspects of and I am not fully able to understand and I feel that my code has strange behavior. Thanks for your help I do not think your problem is related to reference sections. To do anything, but to do the following, consider the following example: We start by removing all the variables from our workspace and Next we create and call the function operators' & lt; - & lt; - 'and' - & gt; & Gt; 'Generally used only in the work, and the present definition of parental assignment causes the discovery of being done through the parents' environment. If such a variable is found (and its binding is not locked) its value is redefined, otherwise the assignment is in the global environment. From the help page:? & Lt; & Lt; The variable created by using but other variables are: setRefClass in RSS. For example,
setRefClass was started I would like to create the variable
X so that this variable is equal to a copy of the example, or the example of
setRefClass Does. Is there a difference:
x = instanceoffsetrphClass
x
A :
rm = Ls ()) A = setRefClass ("A", fields = list (x = "numeric"))
f :
& lt; & Lt; - Main difference between and
=
= was not found in the global environment
R> X1 error: - Object 'x1' not found R & A; A1 Error: Object 'A1' not found
R & gt; ; X 2 [1] 2 R & gt; A2 range "A" field references to "x" square object: [1] 10
Comments
Post a Comment