javascript - Why does W3 validation require populated alt and src attribute for images? -
I am not using these properties as I dynamically add the source later. I do not need ALT either, I want my page to be valid. I can bypass this requirement by using a CSS background inside a div. Is this a legitimate approach?
Explanation: I do not care about search engines. My images are always loaded. I have set up the SRC attribute using javascript. Major modern browsers for Accessibility is not necessary yet. Doctype HTML5 - HTML is a specific structure that is documented on the site. W3 validation assumes that the input specification matches, in this case the requirements match: src attribute should be present An IMG tag with any source has undone the behavior, for example, depending on the browser, instead of a valid image it can re-request the current page. The Alt attribute should be specified and its value should not be empty From the same reference, the need for Alt attribute The justification for: [alt attribute] should be the replacement text which can be used by users instead of the image By question: I do not use these properties because I later dynamically changed the source Sector I introduce. If you want to add swap to dynamically (which also indicates that this specific bit of JavaScript, without page, or at least this markup, is of no use). Anyone) - why not add the img tag dynamically.
& lt ;! DOCTYPE html & gt; Post-text "itemprop =" text ">
because it is valid for a specification
the reason for invalid markup < / H2>
Comments
Post a Comment