haskell - Uncurried functions -
I'm having trouble understanding the curried and uncurried tasks.
In one example I found them saying that
is similar, but I do not know what they are doing. When you can require a maximum of 2 parameters, how can you do a function The move with Haskell is that the task only takes one argument. It seems completely crazy but it really works. A hascal function: Therefore, we can actually write this function definition as follows: And actually the same thing means. This is really super useful because now we can write short codes like: Since the headcount in the action is Haskell is just whitespace, most of the time when you show that the curved functions are uncurried (take more than one argument and just return one result is) . If you really need any unpleasant work: use tuples. edit Int Anfu (a , B) = a + b <> bar this is the compiler What you will be typing right now Such lambda It takes advantage of closing (each internal function can remember 'logic' to the previous ones.) So when We say maximum 4 5
(max 4) 5
(max 4) I'm completely lost.
foo :: int -> Int - & gt; In fact it means: A logic that takes 1 argument, and then gives another task which takes an argument It is called curry.
foo :: int -> (Int -> int) - speak in mathematics: correct associative
foo1 :: int -> IT foo1 = foo 1
uncFoo :: (Int, Int) - & gt; To understand what is happening with a partial applicant,
bar abc = [a, b, c]
bar = \ a - & gt; \ B - & gt; \ C - & gt; [A, B, C]
Bar 1 goes to the compiler and looks at
bar and looks at the outermost lambda, and
bar 1 = If we say that
bar 1 2
times 1 2 If I say "applicable" is blurred, then it means that I mean really from Lambda calculus.
Comments
Post a Comment